|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction.
Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I very much wanted to put 6 on a page, but couldn't. Each side of each card is actually 3.75"x2.75"--the extra .25" is a .125" bleed (extra art area) all around the card. If front/back don't exactly line up, bleed allows the cards when cut to be much less likely to have white-space along an edge. Because of the size and many printer's margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each card landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is even more confusing because the paper and cards aren't the same direction.
Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? The stats looked correct? The art was good? (The beasts deck has over 50% b&w art, but it also has the most cards by far.) |
|
|
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the convenience of the cards; however, with only 4 to a sheet of cardstock and no means to enlarge or place more on a sheet leaves much to be desired. Yes, only 4 to a sheet and there is a lot of white space around the print area. The area that is printed is the size of a standard playing card. I would give these a C+
Randy Black
The Blue Wiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creator Reply: |
|
I wish it were easy to do more per page. Each side of each card is actually 3.75x2.75--the extra is a .125 bleed (extra art area) on each card edge. If front/back don\'t exactly line up, bleed minimizes white-space along an edge when cut. Because of the bleed and many printers margins, the only way to fit more than 4 cards per page is to print each landscape. However, landscape two-sided printing is confusing/error prone because the paper and cards aren\'t the same direction. Is 4 cards/page the main reason to knock the product down 2 stars? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Log In 
